the duotang of lies

funny, in a way that even you can appreciate, ass.

The arbitrariness of cookbooks and our planned retaliation. September 24, 2007

Filed under: bored at work — duotangoflies @ 12:33 pm

Just yesterday, myself, my roaming reporter, our new canine fact-finder and members of our family spent the day together.  During this day, being yesterday, Jeff and his wife, Alicia, decided to make a vegetarian mushroom & nut paté.  

Upon completion we realised the following:

a)  needs way less nuts;

b)   the recipe lists a serving size that is ludicrous (i.e. serves 4 – 6).

Our plan is as follows:

a)  half the nuts.

b)  write our own damn cookbook where when a recipe lists the possibility of serving 4 to 6 with a certain recipe, it also indicates 4 to 6 what.

Allow me to explain.  This paté, as per above, fit an entire loaf pan with some to spare.  There was, to put it mildly, a lot of the stuff.  After initial joking has been completed:  “Four to six?  As a main?  Who eats this much paté?”, Jeff mentioned that perhaps the cookbook meant that it would feed four to six famine-suffering hobos.  They are usually a hungry bunch, and this made more sense.  You can most likely imagine how this then went.  You could have a risotto that serves 16 to 20 caterpillars.  A pavolva that serves one donkey.  We could even make up our own temperature scale—the reitasamgrade:

“Roast your bison for 20 minutes at -47 reitasamgrade, or until done.”

But wait  (you say)!  This has become vraiment compliqué! Not so.  The DoL cookbook would not only include fun recipes for the busy person, but a comprehensive conversion chart so that in the event that you wanted to make the pavlova for the caterpillars instead of a donkey, you would know if you needed to double or half the recipe. *convenience*

 

One Response to “The arbitrariness of cookbooks and our planned retaliation.”

  1. Julia Says:

    Whahahaha! Hilarity!


Leave a Reply